Your Ultimate Guide to Affiliate Commissions
Affiliate commissions are the commercial foundation of every iGaming partnership. Whether you run a casino affiliate programme and want to attract quality partners, or you’re an affiliate choosing between CPA FTD and Lifetime RevShare — understanding how each model works and what rates are realistic is the difference between a profitable deal and one that drains your budget.
This guide covers every commission model actively used in iGaming today: CPL, CPA FTD, RevShare, Tiered RevShare, Lifetime RevShare, Hybrid, and Sub-affiliate commissions. You will also find real industry benchmarks by vertical, formulas for calculating player LTV and break-even, and a practical negotiation guide.
Quick Answer:
- Standard iGaming RevShare: 25–45% (NOT 5–25%)
- CPA FTD: $50–$150 for sports betting / $100–$300 for online casino
- Models like eBook Download or Video Viewing Commissions are NOT used in casino or betting affiliate programmes
Content:
- What are Affiliate Commissions?
- Commission Models — compared
- What Affects Your Commissions
- Payment Terms & Methods
- How to Set Up Affiliate Commissions
- Regulatory & Licensing Impact
- Putting It Into Practice
- FAQ
What are Affiliate Commissions?
An affiliate commission is the payment a partner earns for delivering a specific result to an advertiser’s programme — a registration, a first deposit, or an ongoing share of player revenue. In iGaming, commissions are the core commercial arrangement between operators (casinos, sportsbooks, poker rooms) and their affiliate partners.
Affiliate commissions in iGaming come in two main families:
- CPA (Cost Per Action): a fixed one-time payment per defined action, most commonly a first deposit (CPA FTD)
- RevShare (Revenue Share): an ongoing percentage of the net revenue generated by your referred players
Unlike general e-commerce affiliate marketing where rates of 5–30% are typical, iGaming operates on different economics: RevShare rates run 25–45%, and CPA FTD payouts range from $50 to $400+ depending on the vertical and geography.

What are the most common affiliate commissions?
You can set up your affiliate program with different types of commissions, but the bottom line is whether you pay for predetermined actions or you share a part of the derived revenue. To that end, affiliate commissions can be primarily divided into CPA, or cost per action, and RevShare (Revenue Share). These two core affiliate commission models represent different risk-reward approaches for advertisers and affiliates depending on payment timing and revenue sharing.
Commission Models Compared
| Dimension | CPL | CPA FTD | Standard RevShare | Lifetime RevShare | Hybrid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payout timing | 1–7 days | On FTD (NET15/30) | Monthly | Monthly (ongoing) | CPA immediate + RevShare monthly |
| Risk profile | Medium for both | Low advertiser, high affiliate | Variable | Low long-term, high short-term | Balanced |
| Best for | Finance, insurance, education | iGaming, brokers, sportsbooks | iGaming with strong retention | iGaming, SaaS, subscription | Mature iGaming, fintech |
| Typical rate (2026) | $5–$30 per lead | $50–$400 per FTD | 20–30% NGR | 30–45% NGR | $50–$120 + 20–30% NGR |
| Income ceiling | Volume-capped (offer budget) | Per-FTD payout cap | Player LTV | Player lifetime | Combined cap + lifetime |
| Main downside | Lead quality variance | No retention upside | Operator can change rate | Long ramp to revenue | Contract complexity |
If you have paid traffic with predictable LTV → CPA FTD; if you have SEO/content → Lifetime RevShare; if you have influencer traffic with audience loyalty → Hybrid.
CPA Commission
If you google what CPA stands for, you will always find two transcriptions: Cost-Per-Action and Cost-Per-Acquisition. Both of them are actively used in affiliate marketing. However, the baseline is Cost-Per-Action. Under the CPA scheme affiliates agree to a fixed amount or percentage of an action defined in the affiliate program guidelines of a particular advertiser. In practice, CPA affiliate commissions are preferred when advertisers need predictable acquisition costs and clear attribution for specific conversion events.
Types of CPA commissions
CPA (Cost Per Action) commissions pay a fixed fee each time a referred user completes a defined action. In iGaming, three CPA variants are used. Everything else — CPM, CPC, video views, eBook downloads — belongs to other industries and is not relevant here.
CPL — Cost Per Lead | $3–$20 per registration
You earn a fixed fee for every user who completes a registration on the platform, regardless of whether they go on to make a deposit. CPL is used mainly in email acquisition campaigns and in markets where regulatory restrictions make deposit conversion difficult. It carries lower risk for affiliates but also lower earning potential compared to CPA FTD.
CPA FTD — Cost Per Acquisition, First Time Deposit | $50–$400 per FTD
This is the primary commission model across all of iGaming. You receive a one-time payment for every player who registers AND makes their first verified, real-money deposit after completing identity verification (KYC). Rates vary by vertical and geography:
- Online Casino: $100–$300 (up to $500 in Tier-1 markets such as UK, Germany, Australia)
- Sports Betting: $50–$150 (up to $250 in Tier-1 markets)
- Online Poker: $40–$120
CPA FTD works best for paid media channels where you need fast and predictable returns on ad spend. For deeper coverage, see the CPA marketing fundamentals guide.
Hybrid — CPA + RevShare | CPA $50–$150 + RevShare 20–30%
A combined structure: you receive a reduced upfront CPA fee plus an ongoing RevShare percentage on the same players. Hybrid commission model deals allow affiliates to recover initial costs quickly while building long-term recurring income. Popular among influencers and content creators with consistent, engaged audiences.

RevShare Commissions
RevShare (Revenue Share) is the preferred long-term commission model in iGaming. Instead of a one-time CPA payment, RevShare pays you an ongoing percentage of the net revenue generated by your referred players — every month, for as long as those players remain active on the platform.
Always check whether RevShare is calculated on GGR or NGR:
- GGR (Gross Gaming Revenue): total player losses before any deductions
- NGR (Net Gaming Revenue): GGR minus bonuses, chargebacks, payment fees, and taxes
NGR is the industry standard base. Deductions can reduce your payout by 20–40% compared to what a GGR-based rate would suggest. Always verify the exact deduction formula in your contract.
Three RevShare structures you will encounter
Standard RevShare | 25–45%
A fixed monthly percentage of your players’ NGR. The baseline model used by most iGaming programmes. The more revenue your players generate, the more you earn.
Tiered RevShare | 25% → 35% → 45%
Your RevShare percentage increases automatically as you bring more players per month. Example: 25% for 1–20 active players / 35% for 21–50 players / 45% for more than 50 players. Tiers reward volume — the more you grow, the higher your rate.
Lifetime RevShare | 30–45% with no expiry
You earn your RevShare percentage from a player for their entire active lifetime on the platform — no expiry, no monthly reset. A player you referred years ago through an SEO article may still be generating monthly commission today. The most valuable structure for SEO affiliates and content publishers.
Sub-Affiliate (Master Affiliate) Commissions
A sub-affiliate program (also called a master-affiliate or 2-tier program) is one where the top affiliate earns a percentage of the commissions paid to affiliates they refer. The model is widespread in iGaming and finance, less common in e-commerce, and the basis for most networked affiliate businesses.
Typical rates run 5–10% of the sub-affiliate’s earnings, occasionally up to 15% when a master brings in a high-LTV sub. The override applies to both CPA and RevShare lines, so a master who recruits a successful Lifetime-RevShare affiliate earns a long-tail income themselves.
When does it make sense? For large communities, networks, agencies, and established affiliate managers who can identify and recruit good operators faster than the brand can. The main risk: not every operator allows sub-affiliate programs — read the T&Cs before building a referral pipeline. Some operators ban it outright; others require disclosure of every sub before commissions flow.
5 sub-affiliates × $2,000/month average earnings × 7% override = $700/month in passive income for the master, before considering RevShare tails on the subs’ players.
Factors Influencing Commissions
Several variables determine the commission rate you will be offered — or can negotiate — in iGaming. Understanding them gives affiliates leverage and helps operators price their programmes fairly.
GEO Tier — the single biggest rate driver. A verified player from the UK or Germany generates 5–10× the lifetime revenue of a player from a Tier-3 market. Commission rates must reflect this difference.
- Tier 1 (UK, DE, AU, CA, SE): CPA $150–$400 | RevShare 35–50%
- Tier 2 (BR, MX, IN, PL, ZA): CPA $50–$120 | RevShare 25–35%
- Tier 3 (NG, PH, KE, VN): CPA $15–$50 | RevShare 20–30%
Traffic Source — determines which model suits you best.
- Paid media (PPC, media buy) → CPA FTD. You need fast, predictable ROI on ad spend.
- SEO and content sites → RevShare or Lifetime RevShare. Your traffic compounds over time.
- Streamers and influencers → Hybrid (CPA + RevShare). Balances upfront income with long-term earnings.
Player LTV — what determines how high the operator can afford to pay.
Player LTV = Average Monthly NGR × Average Active Months × RevShare%
Example: $180 × 14 months × 35% = $882 expected lifetime commission per player
Use this formula to evaluate whether a CPA offer is fair. If CPA is below the LTV, RevShare will pay more over time.
Commission Tiers — rewarding volume. Most iGaming programmes use tiered structures: the more players you deliver per month, the higher your percentage. Example: 25% for 1–20 players / 35% for 21–50 players / 45% for 50+ players.
Cookie Duration & Attribution
Standard cookie windows in iGaming
- 30 days — the regulatory floor in some jurisdictions; aggressive in 2026 because Safari ITP and ETP can clip it in practice.
- 60 days — common middle ground; balances operator exposure and affiliate trust.
- 90 days — standard for serious programs; this is what most experienced affiliates negotiate as a minimum.
- 180 days — used by long-cycle operators and brokers; aligns with realistic registration → FTD timelines.
- Lifetime — applies until the player explicitly unsubscribes or breaks the cookie chain; only available in mature, high-trust deals.
First-click vs. last-click
First-click credits the affiliate that introduced the player; last-click credits the affiliate of the final touch before conversion. In iGaming, the registration → FTD gap is typically 7–30 days. Last-click favours the affiliate who closes the deal (typically retargeting or branded affiliates). First-click favours discovery affiliates (content, SEO, influencer). Hybrid attribution (split credit) exists but adds complexity that’s rarely worth the effort.
Cross-device tracking
In 2026, deterministic attribution via login is the only reliable cross-device signal. Postback and S2S tracking carry the click ID across devices via the user’s account, not the device. Without login-based identity, a 30-day cookie can lose 15–25% of valid FTDs simply because the user switched devices.
What to negotiate
Minimum cookie window: 90 days. Mandatory S2S postbacks (signed). Deterministic cross-device attribution where the operator’s user accounts support it. Clear documentation of what happens when the cookie expires and the player converts.
Clawback, Quality Score & Fraud Protection
What triggers clawback
- Fraud — fake account, multi-accounting, bonus farming detected post-payout.
- Chargeback — the player disputes their deposit with the card issuer.
- Bonus abuse — wagering pattern designed to extract bonus value without genuine play.
- KYC failure — the player fails identity verification after FTD.
- Multi-accounting — the same person operating multiple accounts to claim multiple FTD bonuses.
Standard lookback periods
60 days — affiliate-friendly; standard for established partners. 90 days — industry default; gives the operator time to detect coordinated fraud. 180 days — operator-friendly; common in high-risk geos or for newer affiliates. Anything longer than 180 days should be questioned.
Liability caps
- Capped at the last payout — operator can only claw back from the most recent payment. Most affiliate-favourable.
- Capped at 30% of trailing 3-month commissions — common middle ground.
- Uncapped — operator can recover all historical payouts. Avoid if at all possible; this is the riskiest scenario for the affiliate.
How operators score quality
- Player retention — Day-7, Day-30, Day-90 active flag.
- Deposit-to-bonus ratio — players whose deposits barely exceed bonus value are flagged.
- GEO mix — concentration in known fraud-heavy geos lowers the score.
- Wagering velocity — abnormally fast bonus turnover signals abuse.
- Withdrawal patterns — immediate withdrawal after bonus clearance is a classic abuse signature.
4 red-flag clauses to refuse
- “Clawback at operator’s sole discretion” — no objective criteria. Refuse.
- “No lookback period limit” — uncapped time exposure. Refuse.
- “Includes promotional adjustments” — opens the door to retroactive bonus claw. Refuse.
- “No notification required” — clawback applied silently against future payouts. Refuse.
Payment Terms & Methods
Frequency
- NET30 — industry standard. Payouts ship 30 days after the period closes.
- NET15 — for top affiliates or after a 3-month proven history.
- NET7 — rare; reserved for very high-volume partners or programs trying to win them.
- First-month hold — withholding the first month’s payout for 30 days is a normal anti-fraud practice during onboarding.
Minimum thresholds
- $50 — affiliate-friendly; appropriate for new partners or smaller programs.
- $100–$250 — standard.
- $500 — high; only acceptable for established programs where the affiliate is already at scale.
Methods and typical fees
| Method | Typical fee | Settlement time | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank wire | $25–$50 / transfer | 1–3 business days | Most reliable for large amounts |
| Skrill | 1–2% of transfer | Same day | Common in iGaming |
| Neteller | 1–2% of transfer | Same day | Common in iGaming, finance |
| USDT / BTC | 0.5–1% (network fees) | Minutes | Becoming default for tier-2 geos |
| Paxum | 1–2% of transfer | Same day | Common in adult, sweeps |
| Capitalist | 0.4–0.8% | Same day | Common in CIS, LATAM |
Currency and FX risk
Most operators pay in USD, EUR, or GBP. Affiliates earning in one currency but settling in another carry FX risk; this can quietly erase 2–5% of effective payout in volatile periods. USD is the most stable choice in 2026 for cross-border affiliate operations.
What to negotiate
NET15 after first 3 months of clean history; no minimum threshold after the first successful payout; explicit crypto option (USDT or USDC) as a backup payment rail; settlement currency clearly stated in the contract; FX-rate methodology documented (typical: mid-market on the last business day of the period).

How to Set Up Affiliate Commissions
Setting the right commission structure in iGaming requires balancing what attracts quality affiliates with what your operation can sustain. Here is a practical five-step framework. For more on scaling, see affiliate program scaling.
Step 1 — Calculate your sustainable commission ceiling
Optimal Commission Rate = Gross Profit Margin × 20–30%
Example: If your gross margin is 60%, your maximum sustainable RevShare is approximately 25–35% of NGR.
If competitors offer more, close the gap with other incentives: faster payments, No Negative Carryover terms, or a dedicated affiliate manager.
Step 2 — Model player LTV before setting your CPA
Player LTV = Average Monthly NGR × Average Active Months × RevShare%
Example: $180 × 14 months × 35% = $882 expected lifetime commission per player.
Set your CPA below this number. If you offer $300 CPA and average LTV is $882, the maths works. If LTV is $250, it does not.
Step 3 — Define GEO tiers with separate rates. Never apply a flat CPA across all geographies. Use at minimum three tiers:
- Tier 1 (UK, DE, AU): CPA $150–$400
- Tier 2 (BR, MX, IN): CPA $50–$120
- Tier 3 (NG, PH): CPA $15–$50
Step 4 — Match the model to the traffic type.
- Paid media affiliates → CPA FTD (fast ROI, no long-term variance risk)
- SEO and content affiliates → RevShare or Lifetime RevShare (compounds over years)
- Influencers and streamers → Hybrid CPA + RevShare (upfront payment plus ongoing earnings)
Step 5 — Add tiers and schedule performance reviews. Start all affiliates at the base rate. Set automatic tier upgrades when they hit volume milestones: 25% → 35% → 45%. Schedule 3-month rate reviews for top performers.
Common mistakes to avoid:
- ❌ Setting RevShare below 25% — you will not attract experienced iGaming affiliates
- ❌ Same CPA for all GEOs — burns budget on premium traffic and under-rewards Tier-1 partners
- ❌ Changing rates without first modelling the impact on your top 10 affiliates
- ❌ No Clawback protection in the contract — one fraud batch can cost tens of thousands
Regulatory & Licensing Impact
UKGC. The Gambling Commission’s affordability checks (£500/month threshold under the 2024 framework) have shortened typical iGaming player LTV by 20–35% on average. Affiliates running UK traffic increasingly lean towards RevShare because CPA economics break under shorter LTV. Some CPA configurations are effectively unworkable in the UK in 2026.
MGA (Malta). The Malta Gaming Authority tightened affiliate registration requirements from 2022, requiring affiliates of MGA licensees to register on the MGA portal. This added compliance cost but raised the credibility of Malta-licensed affiliate channels.
Germany (GlüNeuRStV). The Interstate Treaty deposit limit (€1,000/month per player across all licensed operators) caps LTV at the regulatory level. RevShare and Hybrid models with NGR-based payouts hit the deposit ceiling faster than pure CPA, changing the affiliate’s economics.
GamStop / self-exclusion. UK self-exclusion via GamStop affects both lifetime affiliate revenue (player removed from the pool) and clawback exposure (a self-excluded player who deposited in the previous 90 days may trigger downstream disputes).
Italy (Dignity Decree). Italy’s advertising ban for gambling has shifted affiliate traffic into licensed comparison sites and content publishers, with paid acquisition tightly restricted. Affiliate channels now carry a higher share of Italian iGaming traffic than they did before the decree.
Belgium (full ban). Belgium’s 2024 advertising ban for gambling effectively eliminated paid affiliate channels; only owned-media affiliates with licensed operators remain viable.
3 take-aways for affiliates
- In heavily regulated geos (UK, DE, IT), favour RevShare over CPA when LTV is capped at the regulatory level — the math otherwise breaks.
- Always check whether the operator’s license requires you to register independently (MGA, UKGC) — non-registration can void commissions retroactively.
- Build redundancy across geos. Single-geo strategies are now operationally fragile because of regulatory shocks.
3 take-aways for operators
- Disclose any regulatory caps to affiliates upfront — surprise caps damage long-term partner relationships and increase churn.
- Adjust commission models per geo, not per program. Same brand, different geos = different models is the new normal.
- Document the regulatory basis for clawback in each market; clawback challenges multiply where the legal basis is vague.
Real-World Examples — 3 Personas
Persona 1 — Paid-media affiliate
Profile. Solo affiliate buying paid-media (push + native) for a Tier-2 casino.
Numbers. $5,000/month media spend; CPA payout $200 per FTD; conversion rate 1.8% from landing page to FTD; ~2,000 clicks/day at $0.083 CPC.
Math. Monthly clicks: ~60,000. Realistic chain: 60,000 clicks → 25,000 LP visits (after redirect drop-off) → 800 registrations → 360 FTDs. Revenue: 360 × $200 = $72,000. Spend: $5,000. Profit before scrubs: $67,000. Apply 12% scrub rate: $59,000 net.
Lesson. Paid-media CPA scales when LP conversion and FTD quality both hold. The biggest risk is scrub — a 12% scrub instead of 5% is the difference between profit and break-even.
Persona 2 — SEO content site
Profile. Established affiliate with a comparison/review site in iGaming.
Numbers. 50,000 organic visits/month; Lifetime RevShare 40%; cohort of 30 FTDs/month with average $80 NGR/month per active player.
Math (Year 1 vs Year 3). Year 1: 30 FTDs/month × 12 months = 360 players acquired. Average NGR settles at ~$60/month after churn. Year 1 RevShare ≈ $50,000 (ramping). Year 3: same monthly inflow + 60% of Year 1 cohort + 70% of Year 2 cohort still active. Aggregate active pool ~600 players × $60 NGR × 40% × 12 = ~$170,000/year.
Lesson. Lifetime RevShare compounds. Patience is the moat — most affiliates abandon the site at Year 1.5 just before the curve takes off.
Persona 3 — Twitch streamer
Profile. Mid-tier streamer with audience loyalty in iGaming/sports.
Numbers. 20 FTDs/month; Hybrid $80 CPA + 25% RevShare; average $120 NGR/month per active player; D90 retention 45%.
Math (month 6). 20 new FTDs × $80 = $1,600 CPA. Pool of D90-active players from prior cohorts: ~30 players × $120 NGR × 25% = $900 RevShare. Total month-6 income: $2,500. Compare: pure CPA at $200 = $4,000 (front-loaded but no tail); pure 40% RevShare = $1,440 (long ramp). Hybrid wins by month 8 on cumulative income.
Lesson. For loyal-audience traffic, Hybrid beats both pure models because cashflow plus tail revenue both matter.
Negotiation Script & Leverage Points
7 leverage points
- Historical EPC and LTV from another program — the strongest single data point you can bring. Show a screenshot of trailing 90 days.
- GEO-exclusivity offer — “I won’t run your competitor in [geo] for 6 months” is worth a higher rate or longer cookie.
- Volume commitment — minimum X FTDs / month buys you better terms.
- Reference to a competing offer — a screenshot of a competitor’s term sheet (anonymise the brand) is acceptable and effective.
- 3-month performance review — agreement to revisit terms upward if performance exceeds an agreed benchmark.
- Longer cookie window — 120 days instead of 90 in exchange for accepting a tighter NCO clause.
- Faster payment terms — NET15 instead of NET30 in exchange for a 14-day clean-history hold.
Sample script
“We currently send 35 FTDs per month from DE to [competitor] with an EPC of €4.20. We’d consider exclusivity if you can match 40% RevShare with no negative carryover and NET15 payouts after a 3-month clean-history period. Happy to share trailing 90-day numbers on a call.”
Instead of Conclusion
Determining your affiliate commissions is one thing, tracking events subjected to commissions is the other thing, worthy of special attention. With several tracking methods available at IREV, your data is in the right hands. By tracking the whole history of your deals, from clicks to conversions, we ensure extra insights about the whole acquisition cycle. You can easily find out which offers work better and which traffic you should send to particular offers.
As a new advertiser, you need a reliable platform to manage and track your campaigns. If you are looking for one, we will eagerly show you how you can start your affiliate program at IREV. Just book a time.
FAQ
1. What is the standard RevShare rate in iGaming?
25–45% is the market standard, calculated on NGR. Top programmes for high-volume affiliates offer 50–55%. Any rate below 25% is below market — negotiate before signing.
2. What is CPA FTD and how does it work?
CPA FTD pays a fixed fee for every player who registers and completes their first verified deposit after identity verification (KYC). Rates: $50–$150 for sports betting, $100–$300 for online casino, up to $400–$500 in Tier-1 markets.
3. What is the difference between CPA and RevShare?
CPA pays once per player action. RevShare pays an ongoing monthly percentage of that player’s net revenue. CPA gives certainty and fast ROI. RevShare gives long-term compounding income.
4. What is Negative Carryover?
If your players generate a negative NGR balance in a month, programmes with Negative Carryover carry that deficit to the next period, reducing future commissions. Programmes with ‘No Negative Carryover’ reset your balance to zero each month — a significant advantage.
5. What is a Clawback clause?
A Clawback clause gives the operator the right to reclaim commissions already paid if fraud or chargebacks are detected. Always check: the trigger definition, the lookback period (90 days is standard), and whether there is a liability cap.
6. How is RevShare commission calculated?
RevShare Payout = NGR × RevShare%. NGR = GGR minus bonuses, chargebacks, payment fees, and taxes. Always verify exactly what is deducted from GGR in your contract.
7. What is Tiered RevShare?
A structure where your RevShare percentage increases as you bring more players per month. Example: 25% for 1–20 players / 35% for 21–50 / 45% for 50+. It rewards volume and long-term partnership.
8. What is Lifetime RevShare?
You earn your RevShare percentage from a player for their entire active lifetime on the platform — no expiry. Rates: 30–45%. Best suited for SEO and content affiliates with loyal audiences.
9. How do I negotiate a higher commission rate?
Bring data: show your EPC and player LTV. Offer exclusivity in a specific GEO. Commit to volume guarantees. Reference competing programme offers. Propose a 3-month performance review clause.
10. What should I check before signing an affiliate agreement?
Verify: the NGR formula (what is deducted), Negative Carryover terms, Clawback conditions and lookback period, cookie duration, attribution model, payment frequency, minimum payout threshold, and exclusivity restrictions.
The What, Where, Why, and How of Partner Programs
Partner programs are a much-discussed topic in the marketing world, but with good reason. They have the potential to be incredibly successful. Implementing a partner program can be a challenge, but it’s worth it. In this article, we’ll explore the pros and cons of partner programs, and whether they’re right for your business. As you read on, you’ll understand why and how partner programs can be so successful, and how to implement one in your own business.